AI models

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5

Same criteria, side by side. Where the gap is small, it may be measurement noise.

Also searched as

Gemini vs Claude Opus

Direct answer: GPQA Diamond: Gemini 4 Argon 96.4%, Claude Opus 5.5 90.6% (Epoch AI). OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 4 Argon 100%, Claude Opus 5.5 100% (Epoch AI). FrontierMath (tiers 1 to 3): Gemini 4 Argon 86%, Claude Opus 5.5 91.2% (Epoch AI). SimpleQA Verified: Gemini 4 Argon 76%, Claude Opus 5.5 72.2% (Epoch AI). GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter): Gemini 4 Argon 96.5%, Claude Opus 5.5 90.2% (OpenRouter Benchmarks). τ-bench Verified (airline): Gemini 4 Argon 78.7%, Claude Opus 5.5 75.3% (OpenRouter Benchmarks).

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5
MetricGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5Source
Weights ?what it isclosedclosedno data
Input US$/1M ?US$ 2.00US$ 4.00no data
Output US$/1M ?US$ 10.00US$ 20.00no data
Context ?1,048,5761,000,000no data
GPQA Diamond ?96.4%90.6%Epoch AI
OTIS Mock AIME ?100%100%Epoch AI
FrontierMath (tiers 1 to 3) ?86%91.2%Epoch AI
SimpleQA Verified ?76%72.2%Epoch AI
GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter) ?96.5%90.2%OpenRouter Benchmarks
τ-bench Verified (airline) ?78.7%75.3%OpenRouter Benchmarks

Compare with

See lab: Google · Anthropic

Sources

  • Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.
  • OpenRouter Benchmarks, CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.
  • OpenRouter, dados públicos da API; exports de benchmarks e rankings em CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.

Dates come from the sources: OpenRouter listing or Hugging Face repo creation, which may differ from the official launch. Family and version were grouped by rule from the name.