AI models

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Same criteria, side by side. Where the gap is small, it may be measurement noise.

Also searched as

Claude Opus vs GPT-6

Direct answer: GPQA Diamond: Claude Opus 5.5 90.6%, GPT-6.1 Sol 95.4% (Epoch AI). OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Opus 5.5 100%, GPT-6.1 Sol 100% (Epoch AI). FrontierMath (tiers 1 to 3): Claude Opus 5.5 91.2%, GPT-6.1 Sol 93.7% (Epoch AI). SimpleQA Verified: Claude Opus 5.5 72.2%, GPT-6.1 Sol 73.9% (Epoch AI). GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter): Claude Opus 5.5 90.2%, GPT-6.1 Sol 94.8% (OpenRouter Benchmarks). τ-bench Verified (airline): Claude Opus 5.5 75.3%, GPT-6.1 Sol 70.7% (OpenRouter Benchmarks).

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
MetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolSource
Weights ?what it isclosedclosedno data
Input US$/1M ?US$ 4.00US$ 2.00no data
Output US$/1M ?US$ 20.00US$ 10.00no data
Context ?1,000,0001,050,000no data
GPQA Diamond ?90.6%95.4%Epoch AI
OTIS Mock AIME ?100%100%Epoch AI
FrontierMath (tiers 1 to 3) ?91.2%93.7%Epoch AI
SimpleQA Verified ?72.2%73.9%Epoch AI
GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter) ?90.2%94.8%OpenRouter Benchmarks
τ-bench Verified (airline) ?75.3%70.7%OpenRouter Benchmarks

Compare with

See lab: Anthropic · OpenAI

Sources

  • Epoch AI, CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.
  • OpenRouter Benchmarks, CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.
  • OpenRouter, dados públicos da API; exports de benchmarks e rankings em CC BY 4.0, latest version we checked.

Dates come from the sources: OpenRouter listing or Hugging Face repo creation, which may differ from the official launch. Family and version were grouped by rule from the name.